AdamAwan/LubbDubb/tree/main/pr-assistant
pr-assistant
協助處理拉取要求:/pr-assistant:pr map 會把它繪成一頁,/pr-assistant:pr walk 會繪出同一張圖,並在旁邊顯示停靠點、差異與備註的面板,陪你逐項檢視。
關於這個 mod
<p align="center"> <picture> <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="docs/brand/logo-dark.svg"> <img src="docs/brand/logo.svg" alt="LubbDubb" width="120"> </picture> </p>LubbDubb
給一位軟體工程師的工作使用、自行託管且持續執行的協調框架——一座會觀察你輸入內容(議題、PR、CI、審查留言)的_駕駛艙_,在心跳時刻決定要做什麼,再派遣 Claude Code 代理執行;只有真正需要判斷的事項才會升級給你。
名稱來自心跳:伺服器核心是驅動一切的週期性脈衝。
要在哪裡讀什麼。
docs/mission.md說明它為何存在,以及它改變了這份工作的哪些部分。本檔案是總覽:框架做什麼、工作如何流轉,以及第一天就重要的設定。完整工作流程(包括另一種流程如何接入)見docs/workflow.md。docs/spec/是應用程式各部分目前行為的規格,以事實寫成——每個設定鍵、每條派遣規則、代理執行階段、API 與駕駛艙都在其中。如果你想知道下面任何內容的細節,答案都在那裡。docs/feature-timeline.md記錄了它如何走到今天。
脈衝
由心跳驅動的重複循環(艦隊忙碌時 heartbeatIntervalMs 預設為 30s;閒置時 idleHeartbeatIntervalMs 為 5 分鐘),也可以隨時手動觸發:
snapshot the world → diff against the last snapshot → reconcile plans
→ decide (dispatcher) → execute (executor) → audit
每個步驟都會記錄。派遣器的理由、它送出的每個動作,以及每個動作的結果都會持久化——因此閒置循環和忙碌循環一樣容易解釋。代理在共用池的 git 工作樹(程式工作)或暫存資料夾(桌面工作)中執行,再透過具型別的工具通道回報。
它做什麼
按照它在循環中的位置分組。每一行都連到負責它的規格。
接收工作
| 功能 | 說明 |
| --- | --- |
| 選擇性監看 | 一個 ${labelPrefix}-watch 標籤決定議題與拉取要求中哪些內容會被處理。標籤之外的內容不會被碰觸。 → [06][s06] |
| 兩個提供者 | GitHub 與 Azure DevOps 透過逐能力的介面接入,另有一個供整套測試與示範執行的 fake 提供者。 → [15][s15] |
| 追蹤器狀態 | 若提供者有工作流程狀態,接取工作會受它們控管,框架會把項目移到進行中與審查中。 → [06][s06] |
| 優先順序 | 優先順序標籤會影響接取;排序後的計畫以接下來顯示,並在目前餘裕處設截線,你可以重新排序。 → [05][s05] |
| 工單看板 | 所有開啟與關閉的項目都能顯示成表格,或顯示成按狀態分欄、可拖曳卡片的看板——卡片落下前會先說明這次投放的成本。 → [17][s17] |
| 附件 | 附在簡報上的圖片會跟著議題交給實際處理它的代理,並存放在所有工作樹之外。 → [12][s12] |
決策
| 功能 | 說明 | | --- | --- | | 規則管線 | 二十多條命名規則依宣告的順序執行,每條都從世界狀態提出工作。順序是資料,不是留言上的數字。 → [05][s05] | | 受限詞彙 | 派遣器只能請求十一種經驗證的動作之一;格式錯誤的內容會被拒絕並留下稽核紀錄,絕不執行。 → [05][s05] | | 逐項 CI 政策 | 針對_哪一項_檢查變紅決定怎麼做——修好它、在指引下修好、因為不屬於我們而暫停,或只升級一次。 → [02][s02] | | 決策紀錄 | 已執行、延後、拒絕與跳過的動作一律記下,附上理由和產生它的規則;還能展開了解那條規則為什麼存在。 → [18][s18] | | 冷卻與上限 | 依來源設定嘗試上限與冷卻時間,讓持續失敗的派遣轉為升級,而不是陷入循環。 → [05][s05] |
執行工作
| 功能 | 說明 | | --- | --- | | 工作樹中的代理 | 有限的檢出池租給各分支,透過切換而非重建來重用,因此回來的分支已經預熱。 → [09][s09] | | 具型別的工具通道 | 代理回呼的 MCP 伺服器——讀取世界狀態、提出它們學到的內容、開啟拉取要求、回報檢查。 → [11][s11] | | 權限後盾 | 代理遇到允許清單之外的命令時會詢問你,而不是卡住。 → [11][s11] | | 每條規則的模型 | 每條派遣規則都分派命名設定——包含模型與執行深度——所以衝突修復和計畫不會用同一種價格計算。 → [02][s02] | | 工作與排程 | 可以從駕駛艙排入臨時提示,也可以用 cron 運算式替你排程;兩者都像其他工作一樣等待空位。 → [13][s13] | | 當機復原 | 重啟後失去所屬的代理會被停放,脈衝也會暫停,直到你復原、重新排入佇列或移除每一個代理。 → [10][s10] | | 即時轉錄 | 點擊代理即可閱讀它正在做什麼、輸入內容,並查看它在執行中途產出的結果。 → [10][s10]、[12][s12] |
拉取要求
| 功能 | 說明 | | --- | --- | | 健康條件 | CI 失敗、落後或和基底衝突、未處理的審查討論串、準備合併——每個分支一個代理,先處理最重要的疑慮。 → [07][s07] | | 艦隊審查 | 預設關閉:框架會先自行讀取拉取要求,再請人介入,並以分流決定要多深入。 → [07][s07] | | 回覆審查 | 每個未處理的討論串交給一個代理,透過框架回覆——在提供者自己的討論串中簽署、記錄並解決。 → [07][s07] | | 堆疊 | 一個部分建立在它依賴的部分上;變紅的基底歸給擁有它的 PR,合併由下往上。 → [07][s07] | | 等你處理 | 某人指派給你的拉取要求、提出要求的人,以及它已經擱置多久。 → [17][s17] |
逐目標的漏斗
| 功能 | 說明 |
| --- | --- |
| 目標評估 | 這裡有可以據以工作的目標嗎?拒絕時會在工單上說明缺少什麼,目標文字變更後就會解除。 → [08][s08] |
| 規劃 | 一個拉取要求,或拆成依賴鏈的多個部分,每個部分都有自己的分支和範圍——也可能是「這已經完成」。 → [08][s08] |
| 計畫核准 | 永遠需要。計畫會帶著風險、範圍外項目,以及任何人如何知道它有效;也能和對話式規劃器討論。 → [08][s08] |
| 評估 | 評估交付的內容,不是代理的信心。它的 no 分支會重新規劃、增加部分,或升級處理。 → [08][s08] |
| 驗證 | 只能透過執行交付物回答的檢查,寫給人執行——或交給你自己的 Claude Code。 → [20][s20] |
| 回顧 | 每個交付目標一份記錄,來源是共用暫存區和框架自己記下的成本。 → [13][s13] |
| 收尾 | 框架從不關閉工單。它會掛上一項寫著你名字的持續義務;追蹤器不再列為開啟時,這項義務才會結清。 → [13][s13] |
上線之後
| 功能 | 說明 |
| --- | --- |
| 環境 | 預設關閉。記錄每個 PR 落地時的提交,以及每個環境是否已經有它——用你自己的命令詢問,結果分成三種狀態。 → [24][s24] |
| 抵達 | 抵達某處可以觸發交付目標欠你的事項,也能在工單上加一行;每個環境都可選擇啟用。 → [24][s24] |
| 部署後監看 | 目標宣告執行中的系統必須呈現什麼;抵達會開啟一段視窗,並按排程詢問你的遙測資料。這裡沒有模型。 → [29][s29] |
| 障礙 | 擋在艦隊前方的事項以鍵值處理,而不是比對文字:兩個獨立聲音、一位負責人,以及永遠不會是人的退出條件。 → [27][s27] |
| 跨艦隊池 | 位於 fleet 之上的那一層:共用儲存庫中每個艦隊一個命名空間,附帶相互佐證模型與摘要。 → [28][s28] |
觀察框架本身
| 功能 | 說明 | | --- | --- | | 需要你處理 | 一條軌道集中顯示升級、計畫核准、對外提案、權限請求、設定健康狀況,以及一次交付留下的義務。 → [17][s17] | | 洞察 | 執行花了多少、產出什麼、最後得到什麼——再加上即時燃燒監看,會找出成本達到其桶中位數數倍的執行。 → [18][s18] | | 跑道 | 以艦隊時間衡量艦隊是否還有工作——以及沒有工作的原因是不是你。 → [25][s25] | | 設定健康 | 每個可能讓艦隊悄悄停擺的設定各一列,每列最後都會對真實世界進行檢查,而不是給建議。 → [26][s26] | | 錯誤紀錄 | 每個捕捉到的失敗都匯入同一條路徑:持久化、鏡像到 stderr,再串流到駕駛艙。 → [18][s18] | | 自行更新 | 框架觀察自己的建置,排空工作,再交給會替換它的監督程式。 → [21][s21] | | 本機執行 | 機器唯一的開發環境,可從駕駛艙啟動和停止,輸出顯示在艦隊已經……
安裝
請先查看作者 README,確認 marketplace 與外掛名稱;指令可能隨儲存庫結構而變動。
claude plugin marketplace add AdamAwan/LubbDubb claude plugin install pr-assistant
原文 / README
LubbDubb
A self-hosted, always-running orchestration harness for one software engineer's work — a cockpit that watches your inputs (issues, PRs, CI, review comments), decides what to do on a heartbeat, and dispatches Claude Code agents to do it, escalating to you only what genuinely needs judgment.
The name is the heartbeat: the server's core is a periodic pulse that drives everything.
Where to read what.
docs/mission.mdis why it exists and what it changes about the job. This file is the overview: what the harness does, how work flows through it, and the configuration that matters on day one.docs/workflow.mdis the workflow in full, including where a different one slots in.docs/spec/is the specification of how every part of the application behaves today, written as fact — every config key, every dispatch rule, the agent runtimes, the API, the cockpit. If you want the detail behind anything below, it is in there.docs/feature-timeline.mdis how it got this way.
The pulse
One repeating cycle, driven by a heartbeat (heartbeatIntervalMs, default 30s while the fleet is
busy; idleHeartbeatIntervalMs, 5 minutes, while it is not) and also
triggerable on demand:
snapshot the world → diff against the last snapshot → reconcile plans
→ decide (dispatcher) → execute (executor) → audit
Every step is recorded. The dispatcher's rationale, every action it emitted, and the outcome of each action are persisted — so an idle cycle is as explainable as a busy one. Agents run in pooled git worktrees (code work) or scratch dirs (desk work), and report back over a typed tool channel.
What it does
Grouped by where in the loop it sits. Each line links to the spec that owns it.
Taking work in
| Feature | What it is |
| ---------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Opt-in watching | One ${labelPrefix}-watch tag decides what is acted on, on issues and pull requests alike. Nothing outside it is touched. → 06 |
| Two providers | GitHub and Azure DevOps behind per-capability seams, plus a fake provider the whole suite and the demo run on. → 15 |
| Tracker states | Where the provider has workflow states, pickup is gated on them and the harness moves the item to in-progress and in-review. → 06 |
| Priority and order | Priority labels weight pickup; the ranked plan ships as Up next with a cut-line at current headroom, re-orderable by you. → 05 |
| Tickets board | Every open and closed item, as a table or a column-per-state board you drag cards across — the drop's cost said before it lands. → 17 |
| Attachments | Images attached to a brief follow the issue to whichever agent works it, stored outside every worktree. → 12 |
Deciding
| Feature | What it is | | ------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | A rule pipeline | Two dozen named rules walked in a declared order, each proposing work from the world. The order is data, not numbers on a comment. → 05 | | A bounded vocabulary | The dispatcher can only ever ask for one of eleven validated actions; anything malformed is rejected and audited, never executed. → 05 | | Per-check CI policy | What to do about which check went red — fix it, fix it with guidance, hold it because it is not ours, or escalate once. → 02 | | The decision log | Executed, deferred, rejected and skipped alike, each with its reason and the rule that produced it, expandable to why that rule exists. → 18 | | Cooldowns and caps | Per-origin attempt caps and cooldowns, so a dispatch that keeps failing escalates instead of looping. → 05 |
Doing the work
| Feature | What it is | | ------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | Agents in worktrees | A bounded pool of checkouts leased to branches and switched rather than recreated, so a branch that comes back starts warm. → 09 | | A typed tool channel | An MCP server agents call back on — read the world, raise what they learned, open a pull request, report a check. → 11 | | A permission backstop | An agent hitting a command outside the allow-list asks you rather than hanging. → 11 | | Models per rule | Named profiles — a model and the depth it runs at — assigned per dispatch rule, so a conflict fix and a plan are not priced alike. → 02 | | Jobs and schedules | An ad-hoc prompt queued from the cockpit, or queued for you on a cron expression. Both wait for a slot like everything else. → 13 | | Crash recovery | Agents orphaned by a restart are parked, and the pulse is held, until you restore, requeue or remove each one. → 10 | | Live transcripts | Click an agent and read what it is doing, type into it, and see what it produced mid-run. → 10, 12 |
Pull requests
| Feature | What it is | | ---------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | Health predicates | Failing CI, behind or conflicting with its base, unhandled review threads, ready to merge — one agent per branch, top concern first. → 07 | | The fleet review | Off by default: the harness reads a pull request of its own before a person is asked, with a triage that picks how thoroughly. → 07 | | Answering a review | Every unhandled thread goes to one agent, replied to through the harness — signed, recorded, and resolved on the provider's own threads. → 07 | | Stacks | A part is based on the part it depends on; a red base is attributed to the PR that owns it, and merging is bottom-up. → 07 | | Waiting on you | A pull request somebody assigned you, who asked, and how long it has been sitting there. → 17 |
The funnel, per goal
| Feature | What it is |
| ------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Goal appraisal | Is there a goal here to work from? A refusal says what is missing, on the ticket, and lifts when the goal text changes. → 08 |
| Planning | One pull request, or a dependency-chained decomposition into parts each with its own branch and scope — or "this is already done". → 08 |
| Plan approval | Always. A plan carries risks, scope-outs and how anyone will know it worked, and can be discussed with a conversational planner. → 08 |
| Assessment | Asked of what was delivered, not of the agent's confidence. Its no arm replans, adds a part, or escalates. → 08 |
| Validation | Checks that can only be answered by running the delivered thing, written for a person — or handed to your own Claude Code. → 20 |
| Retrospective | One write-up per delivered goal, from the shared scratchpad and the harness's own record of what it cost. → 13 |
| Close-out | The harness never closes a ticket. It files a standing obligation with your name on it, which settles once the tracker stops listing it open. → 13 |
After it lands
| Feature | What it is |
| ------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Environments | Off by default. The commit each PR landed as, and whether each environment has it yet — asked with your own command, three-valued. → 24 |
| Arrivals | Arriving somewhere can be what opens what a delivered goal owes you, and what puts a line on the ticket. Both opt-in, per environment. → 24 |
| Post-deploy watch | A goal declares what a running system must show; an arrival opens a window, and your telemetry is asked on a schedule. No model in it. → 29 |
| Obstacles | What is in the fleet's way, keyed rather than matched on prose: two independent voices, an owner, and an exit that is never a person. → 27 |
| The cross-fleet pool | The distance above fleet: one namespace per fleet in a shared repository, with a corroboration model and a digest. → 28 |
Watching the harness itself
| Feature | What it is | | ----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | Needs you | One rail: escalations, plan approvals, outbound proposals, permission requests, config health, and the obligations a delivery leaves. → 17 | | Insights | What runs cost, what they yielded and what came out — plus a live burn watch that surfaces a run several times its bucket's median. → 18 | | The runway | Whether there is work left for the fleet, measured in fleet time — and whether the reason there is not is you. → 25 | | Config health | One row per setting that can stop the fleet silently, each ending in a check against the real world rather than advice. → 26 | | The error log | The one path every caught failure funnels through: persisted, mirrored to stderr, streamed to the cockpit. → 18 | | Self-update | The harness watches its own build, drains, and hands off to a supervisor that replaces it. → 21 | | Local runs | The machine's one dev environment, brought up and taken down from the cockpit, with its output in the pane the fleet already has. → 23 | | Pets | A vivarium at the foot of the rail. Your actions drop eggs; the eggs hatch. It gates nothing. → 22 |
The flow of work
Two entry points, one path. A prompt states a goal and a ticket is found or created for it; a ticket states its own. Everything downstream keys on the ticket, so work started from a prompt is as recoverable, reviewable and reportable as work started from the tracker.
flowchart TD
P([Start with a prompt]) --> G[Goal is stated]
T([Start with a ticket]) --> TK
G -- find or create --> TK[Ticket]
TK --> V{Enough information<br/>to proceed?}
V -- no --> AL[Say what is missing,<br/>on the ticket]
AL --> UW([Stop working it])
UW -. the goal text changes .-> TK
V -- yes --> PL[Plan the work]
PL --> AP{Plan accepted?}
AP -- no, revise --> PL
AP -- yes --> WK[/Do the work/]
WK --> QG{Quality gates<br/>review, CI, a person}
QG -- not satisfied --> WK
QG -- satisfied --> M[Merge]
M --> GC{Goal achieved?}
GC -- no --> PL
GC -- yes --> DV[Deliver: validate, write up,<br/>hand back what is yours]
DV --> AR{Configured<br/>environments?}
AR -- yes --> EN[Watch it arrive,<br/>then watch it behave]
AR -- no --> D
EN --> D([Done])
The standard steps
| Step | What happens |
| ----------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Intake | Every open issue/PR is fetched and shown. What is acted on is decided by the watch tag, plus tracker workflow states where the provider has them. |
| Enough information? | One agent reads the ticket against the repository and says whether there is a goal here to work from. Only an explicit unclear holds anything. |
| Plan the work | A planning agent reads the repo and returns either one PR will do, a decomposition into dependency-chained parts, or this goal is already met. |
| Plan accepted? | Every plan verdict appears in Needs you. Accepting releases the parts to be scheduled; rejecting falls the issue back to the single-PR path, and it can be held. |
| Do the work | An agent per part (or one for the whole issue), each in its own worktree. Code is the most common arm, not the only one — a part may finish with a report. |
| Quality gates | The fleet's own review of the diff (opt-in), then tests, static analysis, pipeline health and human review. Each failing check is classified per check. |
| Merge | A green, approved, mergeable, comment-clear PR is merged — bottom-up for a stack, and never while it is based on another in-flight branch. |
| Goal achieved? | Asked of what was actually delivered, not of the agent's confidence. A no returns to planning, because what is missing may be a different decomposition. |
| Deliver | A validation sheet of checks only a person or a running system can answer; a retrospective written from the record; the tracker state moved and a status comment. |
| Close out | Nothing closes the ticket. A standing obligation with your name on it is filed, and settles itself once the tracker stops listing the item open. |
| Arrival | Where environments are configured: the commit each PR landed as, whether each environment has it yet, and — where declared — whether it is behaving now it is there. |
The gates that carry the loop
Each is a decision something has to make, not a step that always passes.
- Enough information to proceed rejects a goal nothing can act on, before an agent spends itself discovering that. Refusal is not silent — it says what is missing, on the ticket — and it is not permanent: the hold ends when the goal text changes, or when anyone comments.
- Plan accepted is where you see the shape of the work before it happens. There is no switch for it: a plan that started itself can only be undone by a replan, which is strictly worse.
- Quality gates are a set, not a list — tests, static analysis, pipeline health, human review, and the fleet's own review where it is on. The classification is per check, and the third reading is the one that matters: red, but not ours holds and says why, rather than sending an agent at a wall.
- Goal achieved is asked of the delivered work. Its
noarm proposes a replan, a follow-up part, or escalates — depending on what the assessment says fell short.
Priorities when headroom is scarce
The dispatcher ranks every candidate, then applies the concurrency cut. Roughly, highest first:
- An operator queued a job from the cockpit — takes the next free slot.
- A PR with problems: failing CI, a stale or conflicting base, an unhandled review comment.
- A PR that is ready to merge.
- Planning, approval, appraisal and assessment for issues.
- Plan parts, then fresh issue pickup.
PR work runs before new issue pickup, so a PR in trouble is always worked ahead of starting new tickets. The full ordered plan ships to the cockpit as Up next, with a cut-line at the current headroom; you can re-order it, and the override persists.
Where you are in the loop
The harness owns the loop; you own the verdicts. You are asked when — and only when — a decision is genuinely yours:
- Needs you collects escalations, plan approvals, outbound-act proposals, permission requests from agents that hit a command outside the allow-list, the config checks, and what a delivered goal still owes you — a validation sheet to run, a ticket to close.
- Nothing side-effectful leaves without a human, save two standing authorities that are yours: a
stack landing you clicked over named pull requests, and
sendPrRepliesWithoutApproval, on by default, which sends a drafted review reply straight to the thread. A rejection stands until the world gives a reason to ask again — a push, a CI result, an approval, a comment — and the reason you typed is handed to the next agent that works that item. - A restart never decides for you. Agents orphaned by a crash or shutdown are parked, and the heartbeat is held until you restore, requeue or remove each one.
Two things are deliberately fixed: every act reaching the outside world is authorized, and an agent declares that it finished — silence never reads as success.
Getting started
Node >=22.12 and git. A fresh clone installs with npm ci — node-pty is a
native build, so it is not instant (on npm 12+ it builds because package.json
lists it in allowScripts).
npm ci # native dep: node-pty
cp lubbdubb.config.example.json lubbdubb.config.json # your local config (gitignored)
npm start # builds the cockpit, serves on 127.0.0.1:4300
Every key in the config is optional and the harness boots with no file at all — but the defaults
select the real Claude Code runtime, while the shipped example selects the mock one (agentMode: "raw"
against the built-in fake providers). So copy it for a first run and the whole loop turns with no
model or provider credentials. From then on the cockpit's Config page edits that same file
directly, key by key, leaving its comments and ordering alone — hand-editing and the form are two ways
at one file.
npm start builds the cockpit bundle and then runs the server. Two variants matter:
npm run start:server skips the build and serves whatever web/dist already holds, and
npm run serve runs the server under the supervisor that can replace it — which is what
self-update needs, and the way to run it under systemd, NSSM or a long-lived terminal.
→ docs/spec/21
Boot prints what it decided, and the link to open:
[lubbdubb] cockpit listening on 127.0.0.1:4300
[lubbdubb] open the cockpit: http://127.0.0.1:4300/#t=<token>
[lubbdubb] token minted at .lubbdubb/cockpit-token (0600) — reused on the next start
[lubbdubb] heartbeat=300000ms cap=3
[lubbdubb] agent tools: on
Open it once per browser and the cockpit remembers the token. The harness binds loopback only and
every route needs that token, because the cockpit can queue a job — and a job spawns a real agent with
write access to your repo. The token file is gitignored, along with the rest of .lubbdubb/ (the
SQLite database, worktrees, desk scratch dirs and attachments all live under it).
One click: the Claude Code plugin
The harness ships a Claude Code plugin for your own Claude Code: the /lubbdubb:… skills every
Open in Claude Code link in the cockpit calls (/lubbdubb:check 284:C, /lubbdubb:plan 284,
/lubbdubb:ask 284, …), the desktop tool channel those skills talk to, and a notice board: a status
line above your prompt and a panel beside the transcript with what the harness is waiting on you for,
feature progress, pull request states, the fleet and what is up next. Boot writes it to ~/.lubbdubb/plugin:
[lubbdubb] Claude Code plugin 1.0.0-… written to ~/.lubbdubb/plugin — install or update it from the cockpit's MCP tab
Until it is installed the cockpit shows a banner under the top bar; Install it opens the MCP tab,
whose button runs claude plugin marketplace add and claude plugin install for you at user scope, and
removes the hand-registered lubbdubb MCP server and the old /lubbdubb skill if you had them. Restart
open Claude Code sessions to pick it up. Skip it and nothing breaks: every check simply falls to the fleet.
→ docs/spec/11
Then: use Inject event to simulate the world moving (a CI failure, a review comment) and watch the
harness react; click an agent to see its live transcript and type into it; answer items in Needs
you; use New job to launch an ad-hoc prompt, or New schedule to have one queued on a cron
expression (0 9 * * 1-5 — weekdays at nine, read in the harness's own timezone). The Decision log
shows what was decided each cycle and which rule produced it; Activity shows how the world itself
changed.
Needs you also carries the configuration checks — one row per setting that can stop the fleet silently, each ending in a check against the real world rather than a sentence of advice. On a fresh install that rail is the shortest route from the mock loop to a working deployment. → docs/spec/26
Configuration
Every key is optional, and every key, its default and its precedence is in
docs/spec/02-configuration.md. These are the ones that decide
whether a deployment works at all:
| Key | Default | Why it matters |
| ------------------------------ | --------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| repoRoot | the directory you launch in | The git repository worktrees are cut from. Left alone, the harness works on its own checkout. |
| integrations | all fake | Which provider serves each capability — sourceControl, issues, pool. fake is the mock world the demo and the suite run on. |
| github / azureDevOps | unset | The provider's own target: owner and repo, or organization, project and repository. |
| userId | unset | Who you are to the provider. Pickup reads label authorship, so without it nothing is ever picked up and nothing says why. → 06 |
| ownWorkOnly | true | Whether the world arrives filtered to you: your watch tags, your pull requests. A team decision, so it belongs in the project layer. |
| agentMode | stream | stream runs a real model. raw is the mock agent — argv over a terminal — and what the example config and the tests use. |
| maxConcurrentAgents | 3 | The fleet's one size knob: the worktree pool is this plus a slack of two, read live, so raising it raises the pool with it. |
| defaultBranch | "main" | The integration branch. Not auto-detected, and a PR targeting anything else is treated as stacked. |
| heartbeatIntervalMs | 30000 | The gap between timer-driven cycles while the fleet is busy; idleHeartbeatIntervalMs (5 min) while it is not. Everything is also triggerable on demand. |
| labelPrefix | "lubbdubb" | Derives the one -watch tag. Everything is opt-in; an empty prefix turns the gate off entirely. |
| ci.checks | [] | Per-check policy: dispatch, dispatch with guidance, ignore, or escalate. Empty means every red check gets an agent. → 02 |
| agentModels | unset | Named profiles — a model and the depth it runs at — assigned per dispatch rule. Omitted, no launch carries --model. |
| agentAllowedTools | toolchain + read/skill/web | What an unattended agent may run without asking. Anything else is routed to you rather than hanging. Never set this via claudeArgs. |
| sendPrRepliesWithoutApproval | true | Send a drafted review reply straight to the thread. false is the stricter setting: every draft waits in the inbox. |
| review.enabled | false | The fleet reads a pull request of its own before a person is asked. With two or more review.modes, a triage picks how thoroughly. |
| environments | [] | Where landed work travels: a command per environment printing the commit it is at, optionally what an arrival opens and what to watch for. |
| host / port / auth | 127.0.0.1 / 4300 / on | Loopback and a bearer token. A host reachable off this machine with auth.enabled: false is refused at load. |
A first real deployment is about six lines:
{
"repoRoot": "/path/to/your/repo",
"integrations": { "sourceControl": "github", "issues": "github" },
"github": { "owner": "acme", "repo": "app" },
"userId": "your-github-login",
"agentMode": "stream",
"maxConcurrentAgents": 3,
"defaultBranch": "main"
}
Secrets are never config keys. GITHUB_TOKEN for GitHub, AZURE_DEVOPS_PAT (or a logged-in az
CLI) for Azure DevOps, LUBBDUBB_TOKEN for the cockpit — all from the environment, so
lubbdubb.config.json stays safe to paste. Agents inherit your shell's model credentials; a stray
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY silently moves the whole fleet onto API billing.
Several switches no longer exist. Planning, plan approval, the goal appraisal, the assessment, the retrospective, validation, the tool channel and the permission backstop are all unconditional. A config still naming one of them is warned about and ignored, and the warning says what replaced it. → docs/spec/02
Sharing a config with your team
lubbdubb.config.json is yours and is gitignored. A lubbdubb.project.json committed at the root of
the repository the harness works on is the team's: everyone pointed at that repo picks it up, and
each person's own file wins over it key by key. So the CI routing, the environments, the integration
branch and the tracker's state names are written once in the project, while who you are (userId),
which models you dispatch on (agentModels) and how many agents your machine runs stay local. Every
key is legal in it except repoRoot — the file is found through repoRoot, so it cannot be the
thing that sets it. → docs/spec/02
Development
npm run dev # server with reload
npm run web:dev # cockpit with HMR (proxies /api + /ws)
npm test # unit + integration tests (node:test)
npm run smoke # full end-to-end with real node-pty + a git worktree
npm run check # format, lint, typecheck ×2, knip, test — concurrently, in one shot
npm run check is the gate CI enforces. It runs its stages in parallel and reports every failure
rather than stopping at the first; a warm run costs about as long as the test suite alone.
See docs/spec/19-development.md for the test seams, the coverage and
security workflows, and the hosted GitHub Pages demo build.
Documentation
| Where | What it is |
| ------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| docs/operating.md | How to operate the harness: what changes about the job, and what stays yours |
| docs/operating.html | The same guide as a page to skim — open it in a browser |
| docs/workflow.md | The end-to-end workflow, its variation points, and what is narrower than drawn |
| docs/spec/ | The specification of every subsystem as it behaves today |
| docs/feature-timeline.md | What landed when, from the walking skeleton onwards |
| docs/prompt-templates/ | The rule dispatcher's built-in prompt bodies, ready to override |
| CLAUDE.md | Operating notes for agents working in this repo — the sharp edges |
License
MIT. Copyright (c) 2026 Adam Awan.

