ClaudeMods
☰
KO
● 0 명 접속 중 · 조회 0 회
후원프로젝트 제출
공식 예제 · 작성자 anthropics

sec-default

조직을 위한 보안 기본값입니다. 함수 훅을 사용하면 모든 플러그인이 체인 순서에 따라 모든 이벤트에 참여할 수 있으며, 개인이 설치한 플러그인은 사용자 계층에 놓여 조직의 prepend 계층 아래, append 계층 위에 위치합니다. 조직이 현재 설정한 항목 중 일부(기존 훅, 관리되는 CLAUDE.md와 규칙, 설정, MCP 허용 목록, 컴퓨터에 적용되는 deny 규칙)는 함수 훅 이전에는 개인이 접근할 수 없었습니다. 이 플러그인은 가장 바깥에 배치되어 바로 그 항목들을 사용자 계층에서 계속 차단하며, 자체 정책은 추가하지 않습니다. 나머지는 모두 건드리지 않고 통과시킵니다.

번역 완료

이 mod 소개

조직을 위한 보안 기본값입니다. 가장 바깥에 배치되어 조직의 기존 훅, 프롬프트 내용, 설정과 도구 정책이 개인이 설치한 플러그인의 접근 범위 밖에 있도록 하며, 자체 정책은 추가하지 않습니다. 관리형 옵션 allowManagedModsOnly 하나는 mod를 조직 소유 항목으로 제한합니다.

설치

먼저 작성자의 README에서 marketplace와 플러그인 이름을 확인하세요. 저장소 구조에 따라 명령어가 달라질 수 있습니다.

claude plugin marketplace add anthropics/claude-code
claude plugin install sec-default
원문 / README

sec-default

The security default for organizations. Function hooks give every plugin a say on every event, in chain order, and the plugins a person installs sit in the user tier, beneath the organization's prepend tier and above its append tier. Some of what an organization sets today (its classic hooks, its managed CLAUDE.md and rules, its settings, its MCP allowlist, the deny rules in force on its machines) was never within a person's reach before function hooks; seated outermost, this plugin keeps exactly those out of the user tier's reach and adds no policy of its own. Everything else passes through untouched.

It has three moves and nothing else: continue past the user tier (next.to(e, "append")), refuse a user-tier caller or module by name ({ deny } when next.origin.tier is user, { refuse } when a module's pinned e.tier is), or pass (next(e)). A subject's provenance is the event's pinned e.provider; policy is read through $.settings.read({ source: "policy" }), one read serving a burst of tool calls; both fail closed, so an unreadable policy counts as a policy in force.

hooks/register.ts is the module; hooks/policy/ reads the managed settings it decides by.

The rows

| event | from the outermost seat | | --- | --- | | classic.* | Continue past the user tier: the organization's settings hooks see the engine's input and their answer stands. | | prompt.section, prompt.context, skill.prompt, attribution.text | Continue past the user tier: managed CLAUDE.md, rules and policy skills reach the model as written. A person's plugins keep prompt.submit and its additive context. | | prompt.compose | Continue past the user tier: the system prompt's list of sections is what the organization's tiers, the built-ins and the engine's own composition make it. A person's plugin neither drops, reorders nor rewrites a section, nor changes the facts the list is composed from, nor answers a list of its own in its place. The engine raises this event only when some loaded plugin hooks it, so where this plugin is seated every render of the system prompt runs the chain. | | settings.read | Continue past the user tier: no user hook rewrites what any caller reads as settings, this plugin's own policy reads included. | | tool.describe, command.describe, agent.offer, agent.spawn | When the subject's pinned e.provider.tier is prepend or append (a policy-installed plugin, the managed folder, a policy MCP server), continue past the user tier; a subject provided by user, builtin or core passes. | | tool.register | A caller in prepend or append continues past the user tier. A user-tier caller is refused by name while managed settings hold allowedMcpServers (set at all, empty included); otherwise it passes. | | tool.list | The tools of the organization's managed MCP servers are listed as the organization's tiers listed them; every other tool as the user tier left it. With no policy to read, or a refusal from either listing, the organization's listing stands whole. | | tool.check | A deny that a settings rule decided holds over the user tier: when a person's plugin loosened the verdict it was handed, the dispatch is run again past the user tier, and if that verdict is a deny naming its rule, it is the answer. See Deny rules hold. Every other verdict passes as the chain left it. | | plugin.register | A hooks module in the user tier (one a person installed, named with --plugin-dir, or keeps in their mods folder) is refused while managed settings set this plugin's allowManagedModsOnly option; otherwise it passes. Modules in prepend, append and builtin are never asked about. | | everything else | Passes: prompt.submit, turn.*, tool.call, command.run, command.register, session.*, ui.*, fs.*, http.fetch, process.run, store.*, clock.*, model.*, mcp.call, audio.*, agent.list, engine.create. |

Options an administrator sets

Two, in managed settings, under this plugin's own pluginConfigs entry, keyed by the id the CLI builds the plugin in under (only this spelling of the id is read):

{
  "pluginConfigs": {
    "cc-plugin-sec-default@builtin": {
      "options": { "allowManagedModsOnly": true }
    }
  }
}

allowManagedModsOnly: only the mods the organization deploys through managed settings, and the ones built into Claude Code, load. A hooks module a person installed, named with --plugin-dir or keeps in their mods folder is refused whenever it loads or reloads (one already running when the option is set keeps running until then), with one line that names it: mods are limited to your organization's by policy (allowManagedModsOnly); <plugin> was not loaded (in the debug log, and on screen where the session hot-reloads the mod's folder). A plain -p run has it in the debug log alone; the mod is still not loaded. Settings hooks, status lines and /goal are not touched by it.

  • The decision reads the tier the CLI pins on the module and nothing the module says of itself: a person's copy carrying an organization mod's name is still in the user tier and is refused.
  • Refused means nothing of the module joins: no hook, no tool, no command. Its top-level code has run once by then, in the closed context every hooks module is evaluated in, with no call on $ served.
  • Only managed settings are read ($.settings.read({ source: "policy" })): the same entry in a person's, a project's or a --settings file neither turns it on nor off. On unless absent or false, so a mistyped "true" or 1 still locks. A value the settings schema rejects (null, an object), here or in any other pluginConfigs entry, makes the CLI ignore the whole pluginConfigs key with a settings warning, and the option reads as unset.
  • It fails closed: when the read of managed settings is refused (a hook beneath denies it) or this plugin's hook fails, its .catch refuses the module, with the same line, and names the failure in the debug log; so a policy that cannot be read keeps every person's mod out at load. Where this plugin is not seated there is no such rule, and mods load as they do without it.
  • Where managed settings define prependPlugins, that list must name this plugin (next section) for the option to apply.
  • claude plugin test is not covered: it runs a mod's tests in an engine of their own and loads nothing into a session.

allowModsToOverrideDenyRules: the plugins a person installs may answer over a settings deny rule on tool.check, as they could before this plugin held deny rules. Off unless it is the literal true; an option that reads as unset leaves deny rules holding. See Deny rules hold.

What it hooks

classic.*, prompt.section, prompt.context, prompt.compose, skill.prompt, attribution.text, settings.read, tool.describe, command.describe, agent.offer, agent.spawn, tool.register, tool.list, tool.check, plugin.register.

Hooking tool.check has a cost: the engine raises that event only when some loaded plugin hooks it, so where this plugin is seated every tool call now runs the tool.check chain, where before only a session with such a plugin did.

What it calls on $

settings.read, and ui.log: to the debug log, and for the one line a person reads when a deny rule held over a plugin of theirs. It continues to the append tier with next.to, which only a plugin in a managed tier may do.

Deny rules hold

On tool.check any hook may answer any verdict, so a plugin a person installs to stop the permission prompts (() => ({ decision: "allow" })) would also lift a deny rule, a managed one included. Where this plugin is seated it does not:

  • The hook first runs the chain as it is. If the answer is a deny, or no link that may hold a person's plugin answered more permissively than the verdict handed up to it, the answer passes: nothing of the person's loosened anything, and a plugin that only listens adds no run of its own. This is read off next.trace, whose tiers the engine pins: a link that never called next is measured against a deny, and since the engine lists neighbouring plugins that share a worker as one batch under its first member's tier, a prepend entry beneath this plugin counts as well as a user one. Whether a person's plugin did the loosening is never settled here, only by the next step.
  • Otherwise it runs the dispatch once more with the user tier left out (next.to(e, "append")). That verdict never passed through a person's plugin, so neither the decision nor the rule it names can have been rewritten or erased, and a plugin that answered without calling next changes nothing: the rules are evaluated in this run. The two runs differ by the user tier alone, so a deny here that names its rule is a deny rule the user tier loosened, and it is returned in place of the chain's answer.
  • Any deny rule counts, whatever settings file it came from: a verdict carries the rule as written, never where it was read from. A deny that names no rule (a settings hook's, a tool's own check) is not held.
  • An organization's plugin (prepend or append) or a built-in that allows over a deny rule takes part in both runs, so its answer stands (a prepended one that loosens is what brings the second run about, so its hooks run twice on such a call). An ask that a person's plugin turns into an allow, with no deny rule behind it, stands: that is what such a plugin is for.
  • tool.check pins the question (tool, input, tool_use_id), so no hook can have the rules evaluated on one command and another run; a rewrite belongs to tool.call, which runs before any of this.
  • The person is told once for each name in a session, in the transcript and the debug log: <plugin> tried to lift a deny rule in your settings from a <tool> call (<rule>); the deny rule holds over the plugins you install (allowModsToOverrideDenyRules). Plugins the engine ran as one batch are named together, as it names them (audit+easy). A plain -p run has it in the debug log alone; the call is still denied with the rule's own message.
  • If the hook itself fails, its .catch answers from the one run it can read: a deny stands; a verdict no plugin of the person's loosened stands; one they loosened, or a run that rejected, is refused, since the deny rules were never consulted.

An organization that wants the plugins its people install to override deny rules says so in managed settings, under this plugin's own options:

{
  "pluginConfigs": {
    "cc-plugin-sec-default@builtin": {
      "options": { "allowModsToOverrideDenyRules": true }
    }
  }
}

Only the managed source is read ($.settings.read({ source: "policy" })), so the same key in a person's, a project's or a local settings file, or in --settings, is never consulted; only the literal true counts, and a policy that cannot be read leaves deny rules holding.

Where it is seated

The CLI seats it first in the prepend tier wherever hooks modules load on a machine with managed settings or for a Team or Enterprise organization, unless managed settings define prependPlugins: then that list is the whole prepend tier, and the organization names sec-default@builtin in it at the position it wants, e.g. "prependPlugins": ["acme-guard@acme-tools", "sec-default@builtin"], or leaves it out. It is a plugin folder like any other, but its one move that matters, next.to, is refused outside a managed tier, so loading it with --plugin-dir seats a plugin that can only pass.

비슷한 프로젝트